THE ORIELLES/PALE BLUE EYES AT THE ENGINE ROOMS, SOUTHAMPTON – 27/03/23
“How are you?” I say to the woman checking tickets. It’s something I do now: I ask everyone how they are. “How are you?” I say to everyone I come across, but with, I have to say, less and less conviction with each passing day. The woman checking tickets looks at me dubiously. I used to think I could just become a different person but I don’t so much any more.
There’s hardly anyone here when I arrive at almost eight o’clock. They don’t have any ginger beer so I just order some water. The barkeep and I both seem disappointed. “That’ll do,” I say when the plastic cup is just half full. I go and sit by the railings at the front, reciting the ‘To be or not to be’ speech, which I tried to memorise today, in my head. I am the only person anywhere near the stage.
Anywhere near the stage
PALE BLUE EYES are having an infectiously good time, playing their infectiously melodic sort of power pop – I think you’d call it that, though it’s not a term I’ve ever really had much truck with sounding, as it does, like something a cartoon character would do – and it’s so infectiously upbeat you’d have to be a cold, indifferent kind of person not to feel some sort of affection towards it. There’s not a lot not to like, which while not a reason to like it, is at least a reason not to not like it. The singer reminds me of someone but I can’t work out who.
I think it’s Norman Blake he reminds me of, which makes sense.
(“To be or not to be that is the question whether ‘tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune or to take arms against a sea of troubles and by opposing end them to die to sleep no more and by a sleep to say we end the heartache and thousand natural shocks that flesh is heir to to die to sleep to sleep perchance to dream ay there’s the rub for in that sleep of death what dreams may come when we have shuffled off this mortal coil must give us pause there’s the respect that makes calamity of so long life for who would bear the scorns and whips of time the oppressor’s wrong the proud man’s contumely the pangs of disprized love the law’s delay the insolence of office and the spurns that patient merit of th’unworthy takes when he himself might his quietus make with a bare bodkin who would fardels bear to grunt and sweat under a weary life but that the dread of something after death the undiscovered country from whose bourn no traveller returns puzzles the wits and make us rather bear the ills we have than fly to others we know not of thus conscience does make cowards of us all and thus the natural hue of resolution is sicklied over with the pale cast of thought and enterprises of great pitch and moment with this regard their currents go awry and lose the name of action”)
I may be getting this all wrong but there seems to be a kind of tension at the heart of THE ORIELLES. It’s the tension between female poise and restrain and masculine dynamism and aggression; between cosmic dreaminess and earthy rawness; rough and smooth, noise and melody, etc. The kids were watching this video about atoms the other day, all about how the neutrons were negative and the electrons were positive or something like that, and it reminds me of that video. For some reason tonight I can’t stop thinking about neutrons and electrons, about opposing forces and the tension that keeps us together and drives us forward.